When the first post–Cold War conflagration ignited in the former Yugoslavia, U.S. This myopia betrays a deeply flawed understanding of how the world order would be shaped at the end of the Cold War.Ĭonsider just a few examples of how American leaders fumbled certain specific challenges at the end of the Cold War. The hawkish think tank Institute for the Study of War (ISW) recently warned that Vladimir Putin is taking advantage of the coronavirus crisis to “advance his strategic objectives in Ukraine.” That ISW would focus on a nation that is largely irrelevant to American national interests and do so even in the midst of a terrible pandemic in the homeland is representative of the more general myopia of the American national security community. Awareness of the complex history that gives rise to conflict strengthens the hand of diplomacy. IPD is reprinting it with permission from the author.Įditor’s Note: The rawness and tragedy of war often reinforce a tendency to discount longstanding historical and cultural cleavages for a narrow focus on strategy and battle tactics, but a proper realism must be conscious of the milieu of conflict. The following piece originally appeared in The National Interest in May 2020. Image credit: Presidential Office of Ukraine
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |